Tiggo 8Plus has just been launched, but the whole car is actually based on the improvement of Tiggo 8. Therefore, the structure of the whole car is actually the same. In fact, you can understand by looking at the sides of the two cars. There is almost no change between Tiggo 8Plus and Tiggo 8. In terms of safety, it is of the same origin, but in the final analysis, even if Tiggo 8 has a lot of actual combat experience, it cannot fully represent Tiggo 8Plus, and the recent small impact accident of a Tiggo 8Plus in Chongqing has brought some differences. The effect is that this time it is not a car, but a thick tree on the side of the road.
Although it is a big tree, it is not as good as a concrete telephone pole, but it is solid. The key is to be strong. Experience for yourself how wide the headlights of the Tiggo 8Plus are. The diameter of this tree is almost the same as that of the headlights. The right side of the Tiggo 8Plus The side came directly to the big tree like this, unbiased, it was exactly the angle of 25% offset, and it was the side of the co-pilot that most people were more concerned about.
Judging from the damage, the entire right front light is completely scrapped, and there are signs of water stains on the ground. However, it is located in the right front light, which should not be a water tank. From the analysis of the cabin layout, it should be the location of the glass water. This is the truth. The damage of the impact is a little ugly. Whoever hits a fixed object is still a big tree that is thick enough, and it is considered tough without disintegration.
Looking at the side again, the damage is more serious. Sure enough, we can see that the pipeline for storing glass water is completely damaged. In addition, we can see that there are scattered bark at the roots of the big tree. At the same time, we can see that the big tree is indeed strong enough. No wonder the 1.54 ton Tiggo. The 8Plus can’t shake the foundation. The curling of the engine cover also shows that the impact is not small. Look at the surrounding environment and urban road conditions. I just didn’t want to understand how it crashed into the big tree on the roadside. Of course, the actual situation is unknown. What is the emergency? No conclusion can be drawn here because of the situation that caused the accident. Just analyze the state after the accident. After hitting the big tree, the entire right side of the impact was carried. Of course, the speed should not be high. After all, it is urban road conditions, because the big tree has a circular cross section , The damage is relatively concentrated, there is no deep diffusion, as long as the right side bears the impact, and this is very important. Note that the entire right side is almost wrapped outside the tree, which also causes all the impact to be concentrated in a very narrow In a small area, even if it fails to hit the front anti-collision steel beam, it is natural that the airbag sensor will not be triggered. Therefore, the structural strength of the whole vehicle becomes the key, relying on its own hard power; of course, there are benefits, as long as The airbag does not pop up, and the internal loss is almost negligible.
Another problem is the ACC adaptive cruise control millimeter-wave radar and AEB automatic emergency braking system in the red circle above. When combined, it is why the ADAS system does not work. Look at the angle above, and then look at the back. The width of the road, I am afraid that the front of the car will be deflected (not facing) to the big tree at the moment of the accident. It is also a blind spot range. In addition, the distance may be too close. It is basically impossible to trigger the system to actively intervene in braking (whether it is a detection radar or The camera and the window interface are gradually spreading outward in a horn-like shape), but fortunately, the loss is controlled within a certain range, that is, the right front headlight, engine cover, right cabin bracket, and front bumper (the most troublesome It means that the front grille and the front bumper are integrated) and so on, it really costs a lot of maintenance costs. Although netizens ridiculed that they did not knock down the big tree and gave a bad review, but from this standard 25% In terms of offset bumping, or the effect of bumping a cylinder, it has achieved the expected structural design purpose, and more importantly, it is the co-pilot side. It seems that Chery’s safety structure has not been spent so many years in vain.